Shop More Submit  Join Login
×

:iconnayzak: More from Nayzak


Featured in Collections

Journals by NanisKa


More from deviantART



Details

Submitted on
January 26, 2012
Submitted with
Sta.sh
Link
Thumb

Stats

Views
5,733 (1 today)
Favourites
41 (who?)
Comments
139
×

Brainwash the masses

Journal Entry: Thu Jan 26, 2012, 3:01 PM



It really makes me sick to see how the western Media twists things in order to vilify Muslims at every opportunity. I received a note regarding a case of a supposedly 'Muslim' guy who raped girls at night. after checking the news article, I went to google the name of this 'Muslim' guy and see other news. from what I read, I'd like to share some thoughts with you guys and girls:

In www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic… the title says:
'Strict Muslim' raped four women at knifepoint to 'punish them for being on the streets at night'
notice the 'Strict Muslim'. it MUST appear in the title to attract attention.
the article starts with:
A Muslim man who raped women to 'teach them a lesson' for being on the streets at night was jailed indefinitely today because of the danger he poses to women.

they are referring to him as 'A Muslim man'. this became a tradition in the western media. when the criminal happens to be a Muslim, he should be called 'A Muslim man'. his name is not as important as his religious background.
in www.thisislondon.co.uk/standar… the title was:
Muslim raped women for being out late
same sickness. they started the article by:
"Sunny Islam, 23, who comes from a strictly religious family..."

so they are telling us this guy's name is "Sunny Islam". I don't know how the word 'Islam' came into his name. probably so that if his religion is not mentioned, his name will say it all. and Sunny is NOT an Islamic name. I have never met a Muslim with such a name. usually Muslims use Arabic names of the prophets and companions of the prophet Mohammed -peace be upon him-. especially if they are devout and strict Muslims. you may find names such as Mohammed, Ahmad, Ali, Omar, Uthman, Yusuf, Musa, Yunus and many others. or names such as Abdullah, Abdurraheem, Abdussamad (abdu -which means 'servant of'- + one of Allah's names)... but no one uses English names such as Sunny.
and they made sure to claim he comes from a 'strictly religious family'. how did they know that? no idea. but of course, he must be. otherwise, they can't blame Islam for what this criminal did.
and check the double entendre here:
Police fear that Islam may have attacked many more.

it's ridiculous how they used his name and made it seem they are referring to the whole religion of Islam.
Islam, who told the jury he was a practising Muslim, was convicted of seven charges of rape, one of sexual assault and one of kidnap.

they must add this nonsense. by doing so, they are giving the reader the impression that the actions of this guy are based on Islamic teachings. sick sick sick!
He was traced through the number plate of his girlfriend's car after he kidnapped and raped the 15-year-old in September 2010.

so this 'strictly religious practicing Muslim' has a girlfriend. you know what? the Boyfriend/Girlfriend relationship is un-Islamic. there is not even a single Muslim scholar who would support it. in Islam, you love a girl, marry her. full stop.
His mother, in religious dress, sat with her covered head bowed throughout and wept as her son was jailed.

even small unnecessary details have to be brought here to bring a picture of how 'Islamic' is his family and him.
Judge Lees said: 'The fact that you have attacked these women not withstanding your background must represent your own wholly warped personality.'

TRUE. his sickness only represents him and him alone. but this statement has to be in the bottom of the article. I bet all readers are NOT gonna pay much attention to it in the end.


by reading the article, you find no mention of any victim names. I really wonder if the story is real. it's too suspicious. but let's suppose it's real.
so here, we have a story (if true) of a criminal who is called 'Islam' (if true) and is strictly religious and practicing Muslim. what do they want to tell you?
they are telling you this is the ideal Muslim behavior. barbaric rapist. according to the news, the guy wanted to teach 'them' a lesson. teach whom? the non-Muslim women living in a non-Muslim country?????
:bulletred: first, rape is a grave sin in Islam (against Muslim or non-Muslim women). it's unjustified and unacceptable no matter what is the condition.
:bulletred: second, non-Muslims are not required to respect and follow Islamic law in non-Muslim countries. Islamic law is for the Muslims alone. in Muslim countries, non Muslims have to follow the state law just like any Muslim citizen. but they don't have to follow Islamic religious laws.
:bulletred: third, Muslim individuals are not required to apply Islamic law in non-Muslim countries. simply because Islamic law needs a legal Muslim government which doesn't exist in non-Muslim land.
:bulletred: fourth, Muslim individuals are not required to go around and apply the law by themselves even in a Muslim country. there are legal authorities that do that.
so when you hear such twisting tales in the news, know that they are attempting to brainwash you. because there is NOTHING ISLAMIC about the guy and his actions (if true)


Now let me tell you another story:

there is one guy under the name of Jerry Sandusky with 40 counts of sex crimes against young boys (the filthy guy is a sodomite)
here are a few news titles from dailymail.co.uk:
Now ELEVENTH teen says disgraced former Penn State coach Sandusky 'raped him at summer charity camp'
calling him 'disgraced' seems enough for the media. but mentioning his religion is not necessary.
Jerry Sandusky 'sexually abused young boy he met through his charity more than 100 times and threatened family to keep quiet'
notice they call him by name.
Now Penn State 'paedophile Jerry Sandusky is accused of sexually abusing one of his own GRANDCHILDREN
even his own grandchildren didn't escape the monster. but still, religion is not mentioned.
Jerry Sandusky's daughter-in-law gets restraining order to keep Penn State 'paedophile' away from grandchildren
and many more articles. but I found no mention of his religion. I had to google his name '+religion' to find out this Sandusky to be a United Methodist www.christianpost.com/news/jer… but that's not important for the Media or the public, right?

Another guy under the name Joe Paterno was charged with covering up the child-sex abuse scandal related Sandusky so he was fired after 46 years of coaching his football team (well deserved).
some of the titles related to this issue are:
Legendary Penn State head football coach Joe Paterno under pressure to resign after two of his top officials charged with perjury over child-sex abuse scandal
and
Joe Paterno contacts high-powered defense attorney one day after firing as Penn State sex abuse scandal continues to burn
Again, I had to google his name '+religion' to find out he was a Catholic. but I guess that's also not important.

Imagine. just imagine that Sandusky and Paterno were Muslims. what would the headlines be? I don't wanna imagine, but I know it will be something really filthy.


What I want to say is this:
the Western media is very biased and dishonest when dealing with Muslims. when a sick criminal happens to be a Muslim, they give great importance to his religious background selecting words to imply his coming from a 'strict' and 'religious' family and being a 'practicing Muslim'. and his actions were based on his 'religious teachings'. but when the criminal is not a Muslim, nothing is mentioned.
same goes for honor killing, domestic violence and all kinds of crimes...

now think about it for a while. when the reader reads the words 'Islam' and 'Muslim' whenever he reads about these disgusting crimes, in his brain the word 'Muslim' will be equated to 'rapist', 'bomber', 'hijacker', 'terrorist'... and this is how Islamophobia is planted in people's minds. of course, those who are familiar with Islam and have a little knowledge about it will be able to make the difference. sadly many can't do it because all they hear is this lying Media.

Indeed there are Muslim criminals. but there are also Christian criminals. and Jewish criminals. and Buddhist criminals, Hindu criminals, pagan criminals, atheist criminals and [insert religion name] criminals... black sheep are found in every nation. there are no good Muslims and bad Muslims, good Christians and bad Christians, good Jews and bad Jews, good atheists and bad atheists... no. we don't divide people like this. we divide them like this: good human and bad human.






I hope this was beneficial for you

Wassalaamu alaikum

Add a Comment:
 
:iconsososurprise:
SosoSurprise Featured By Owner Jan 5, 2013  Hobbyist
So sad what the media is doing ....only wai to grab attention o.o
Reply
Flagged as Spam
:iconrebelliousrehan:
RebelliousRehan Featured By Owner Feb 20, 2012  Hobbyist Interface Designer
this is sick!
Reply
:iconborisfedorov:
BorisFedorov Featured By Owner Feb 20, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Yes I hate it to, and I have some comedy skit to cheer you up [link]
Reply
:iconmloun:
Mloun Featured By Owner Feb 20, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I love you, Nayzak. :)

(... No wait... I'm supposed to be a straight man ! :rofl:)
Reply
:iconpsy-warrior:
psy-warrior Featured By Owner Feb 20, 2012   General Artist
western media have become the Dr Goebbels of zionism _ they don't do it accidentally _ it's a deliberate aggression against the masses and a ruthless suppression of truth _ it should be met with the same level of ruthlessness at every opportunity
Reply
:iconthegreekweegee:
thegreekweegee Featured By Owner Feb 20, 2012
Do you know what sickens me? Religious discrimination of any kind.

Although I'm an Atheist, I believe every person should believe in what S/HE wants to believe. End of story.
Reply
:iconguardian54:
Guardian54 Featured By Owner Feb 20, 2012  Student General Artist
The only occasions when Islam has resorted to Jihad is in retribution for Christian Crusades. Hindu and Buddhism have not had any major wars launched in their name for gain, and neither has Islam (vengeance is not "gain"). Christianity is the ultimate subliminal messaging technology of warmongers. The big problem is that the audience is stupid enough to eat it up.

I don't have a problem with Islam or any other religion really, I just have a problem with the state laws in Saudi Arabia: Women cannot drive cars, ride bikes, or drive anything except jet aircraft. What?

I also have a problem with how it's all an excuse for wars. Whatever Deity is out there (you can lump it into one identity like Allah or God, or split its thought processes into say the Hindu Gods) is probably as pissed as can be at the sorry state of affairs on Earth, assuming it even cares anymore.
Reply
:iconguardian54:
Guardian54 Featured By Owner Feb 20, 2012  Student General Artist
In conclusion, Islam is, like Hinduism and Buddhism, a peaceful religion at heart. However, it would be nice if the laws of the countries were less oppressive toward women. I'm a guy, but on fanfiction.net (same user name as here) my current main series (SI Archives) will have the main protagonists eventually go toe-to-toe with Saudi laws. I mean, trying to arrest a head of state for talking with her subordinates (she's unmarried, so her father is supposed to be around for this by Saudi laws) in a Starbucks picking up lunch for the whole guard entourage is... yeah.

Of course, just because a few countries have extremist laws doesn't mean the prevalent religion there is bad. By that logic, Christianity is screwed because of the laws against Africans in the Age of Slavery. These slanderers should STFU...

Peace to you, my friend, allahu akbar (may have failed at spelling that.)
Reply
:icondandabug:
Dandabug Featured By Owner Feb 20, 2012
This example if unfortunately the norm for reporting in the U.S. when anyone of Islamic (or Sikh, or Hindu, or [insert religion that might seem 'Muslim' to ignorant wasterners] affiliation commits a crime, is involved in a crime, or in any way might be implicated in a crime.

Rewind to 60 years ago, and you would see similar headlines in relation to the anti-black racism of the time. If a white man killed a woman, the media would report "man kills woman." If a black man did it, they would say "negro kills woman" ...or, more likely, "NEGRO KILLING SPREE!!

...it's the same ridiculous ignorance and prejudice as always, just with a new target in mind. The only comfort I can offer is that eventually, truth and open-mindedness shall win out, just as it did with the previous scenario (well, we're actually still working on that, but... you get the idea).
Reply
Add a Comment: